TexasTerror
February 19th, 2006, 09:12 PM
We have two I-AA schools here in the SLC that have three I-A games this year. Southeastern Louisiana and Northwestern State. Leads me to believe that if we had 12 game schedules, some teams that have had two I-A games consistently (SHSU for instance who had two in 2003, 2005 and 2006) may go to three teams.
Besides the $$$$ factor, what do you think would be the biggest reason for going to three I-A games for the SLC and in general, for the rest of I-AA, which could very well happen?
Here are some reasons, but which do you feel is the most dominant for the SLC and in general?
1) More I-AA schools are playing I-A games that would not in the past and multiple ones at that, meaning less OOC spots.
2) The SWAC, a geographically obvious scheduling partner of the SLC, has a nine-game mandate. They have two OOC spots, which in most cases is only one because of 'Classics' that occur yearly and/or rivalry games.
3) Geographically speaking, most I-AAs (non-schollies included) are on the east coast. Seen the I-AA map lately? East coast I-AAs are less likely to play the SLC, GWFC and Big Sky. Why should they when they can get a nice mix of I-AAs and even I-As or Div IIs from their side of the world?
4) Conference expansion. The SLC is going to have one less OOC game because of UCA which limits flexibility more. The Big Sky, a conference which has played the SLC a great deal (Montana St vs SFA, Montana vs SHSU, NoCo vs TxSt, etc) is adding Northern Colorado this year, one less OOC game for them.
5) Guaranteed dates. More schools are having non-conference schedulingissues so they'd rather settle on one or two sub-Div I games where they can bring in an opponent. (I remember the Montana fans griping that they had a sub-Div I opponent for once).
Any others I'm forgetting? What's the big issues here?
Besides the $$$$ factor, what do you think would be the biggest reason for going to three I-A games for the SLC and in general, for the rest of I-AA, which could very well happen?
Here are some reasons, but which do you feel is the most dominant for the SLC and in general?
1) More I-AA schools are playing I-A games that would not in the past and multiple ones at that, meaning less OOC spots.
2) The SWAC, a geographically obvious scheduling partner of the SLC, has a nine-game mandate. They have two OOC spots, which in most cases is only one because of 'Classics' that occur yearly and/or rivalry games.
3) Geographically speaking, most I-AAs (non-schollies included) are on the east coast. Seen the I-AA map lately? East coast I-AAs are less likely to play the SLC, GWFC and Big Sky. Why should they when they can get a nice mix of I-AAs and even I-As or Div IIs from their side of the world?
4) Conference expansion. The SLC is going to have one less OOC game because of UCA which limits flexibility more. The Big Sky, a conference which has played the SLC a great deal (Montana St vs SFA, Montana vs SHSU, NoCo vs TxSt, etc) is adding Northern Colorado this year, one less OOC game for them.
5) Guaranteed dates. More schools are having non-conference schedulingissues so they'd rather settle on one or two sub-Div I games where they can bring in an opponent. (I remember the Montana fans griping that they had a sub-Div I opponent for once).
Any others I'm forgetting? What's the big issues here?