View Full Version : Why Not Wofford as a seed?
drpnut
November 20th, 2010, 08:10 PM
if Jax St. does lose, then does Wofford get looked at as a seed, possibly no. 5?
walliver
November 20th, 2010, 08:12 PM
It would be nice, but, without a quality OOC win, we should be satisfied with a first round bye - unless we get woffed out of that.
Edge316007
November 20th, 2010, 08:14 PM
A case could be made, but I agree with walliver. They need a quality OOC win.
jmufan999
November 20th, 2010, 08:23 PM
if Jax St. does lose, then does Wofford get looked at as a seed, possibly no. 5?
i believe they not only deserve the #5 seed, but they will actually GET that seed as well.
TypicalTribe
November 20th, 2010, 09:00 PM
i believe they not only deserve the #5 seed, but they will actually GET that seed as well.
Of the following, who would you slot them ahead of:
ASU
EWU
MSU
SFA
W&M
UD
I think everything has broken right for them to get a home game, but I think a seed is just a little bit out of reach.
FCS_pwns_FBS
November 20th, 2010, 09:51 PM
Of the following, who would you slot them ahead of:
ASU
EWU
MSU
SFA
W&M
UD
I think everything has broken right for them to get a home game, but I think a seed is just a little bit out of reach.
I would put them ahead of W&M and EWU.
soccerguy315
November 20th, 2010, 10:01 PM
I would put them ahead of W&M and EWU.
based on quality wins?
woffordgrad94
November 20th, 2010, 10:32 PM
Wofford will not be a seed, and after the beating we took in Boone, I don't think we really deserve one to be quite honest. Given our history in the playoffs, I would be surprised if we even get a home game at all, although a case could be made for that given our strong bounceback win against a good Chattanooga team that also had a lot to play for.
TypicalTribe
November 20th, 2010, 10:43 PM
Wofford will not be a seed, and after the beating we took in Boone, I don't think we really deserve one to be quite honest. Given our history in the playoffs, I would be surprised if we even get a home game at all, although a case could be made for that given our strong bounceback win against a good Chattanooga team that also had a lot to play for.
I think it would be a crime for the Terriers not to get a home game especially given the overall weakness of the likely playoff field.
walliver
November 20th, 2010, 10:46 PM
I think it would be a crime for the Terriers not to get a home game especially given the overall weakness of the likely playoff field.
With likely 2 MEAC teams, maybe 2 Big South teams, an NEC team, and possibly even a PFL team, simply "making the playoffs" has lost a lot of its luster.
TypicalTribe
November 20th, 2010, 10:48 PM
With likely 2 MEAC teams, maybe 2 Big South teams, an NEC team, and possibly even a PFL team, simply "making the playoffs" has lost a lot of its luster.
THat's the downside of going to 20 teams. Doesn't seem like much of an expansion, but the dilution is obvious.
bullseye44
November 20th, 2010, 11:42 PM
THat's the downside of going to 20 teams. Doesn't seem like much of an expansion, but the dilution is obvious.
This would have been a really interesting year to have had a 16 team playoff. You figure most years of 16 teams, there was maybe one 7-4 team in the field every 3 years or so. This year there probably would've been 3 or 4. Such parity this year - should make for some exciting playoff matchups. I think a big advantage goes to the home teams across the board with such seemingly equal teams near the top.
Longhorn
November 21st, 2010, 03:40 AM
I would put them ahead of W&M and EWU.
That's a joke, right?
CAAisBOSS
November 21st, 2010, 04:34 AM
simple rule... lose by 30 to any team... not a top 10 team.
PantherRob82
November 21st, 2010, 05:15 AM
simple rule... lose by 30 to any team... not a top 10 team.
Exactly.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.