PDA

View Full Version : NCAA Football Playoff Law Suit



Rekdiver
January 8th, 2010, 10:33 AM
It is time to sue under class action status the NCAA and the bowls for racketeering and violation of the Sherman Anti Trust Act.

Competition law, known in the United States as antitrust law, has three main elements:

prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business. This includes in particular the repression of cartels.
banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position. Practices controlled in this way may include predatory pricing, tying, price gouging, refusal to deal, and many others.
supervising the mergers and acquisitions of large corporations, including some joint ventures. Transactions that are considered to threaten the competitive process can be prohibited altogether, or approved subject to "remedies" such as an obligation to divest part of the merged business or to offer licenses or access to facilities to enable other businesses to continue competing


Why doesn't some attorney who wants to make a name of themselves jump on this?

JMUNJ08
January 8th, 2010, 10:55 AM
It is time to sue under class action status the NCAA and the bowls for racketeering and violation of the Sherman Anti Trust Act.

Competition law, known in the United States as antitrust law, has three main elements:

prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business. This includes in particular the repression of cartels.
banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position. Practices controlled in this way may include predatory pricing, tying, price gouging, refusal to deal, and many others.
supervising the mergers and acquisitions of large corporations, including some joint ventures. Transactions that are considered to threaten the competitive process can be prohibited altogether, or approved subject to "remedies" such as an obligation to divest part of the merged business or to offer licenses or access to facilities to enable other businesses to continue competing


Why doesn't some attorney who wants to make a name of themselves jump on this?

The BCS has a hand in this too xreadx

tribe_pride
January 8th, 2010, 10:56 AM
He has been saying this for a year but

http://www.abc4.com/content/news/top%20stories/story/Utah-AG-ready-for-lawsuit-against-BCS/SWbKCM-smUCuK0KnlCvYWw.cspx?rss=20