PDA

View Full Version : Vick released from federal custody



BDKJMU
July 20th, 2009, 02:47 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4340597

Do he play this season? If so, for whom?

GannonFan
July 20th, 2009, 03:01 PM
I don't see him playing this year. Goodell could ban him for this year, which I think is a mistake but I don't get to make those decisions.

Cobblestone
July 20th, 2009, 03:02 PM
He'll be a Raider in no time.

jstate83
July 20th, 2009, 03:42 PM
It's overkill if he's not reinstated this year.
He's been gone for 2 years so what is the purpose of suspending him all over again going to do except apease the dog psyco's.xsmhx

Goodell need to stop letting PETA/Dog psyco's bully him into decisions and just leave it up to the NFL TEAMs to decide if he play again by giving him a shot.

2 years and $50 million in lost income is enough.
Reinstate him and move on. xsmhx

tribe_pride
July 20th, 2009, 07:59 PM
I don't see him playing this year. Goodell could ban him for this year, which I think is a mistake but I don't get to make those decisions.


It's overkill if he's not reinstated this year.
He's been gone for 2 years so what is the purpose of suspending him all over again going to do except apease the dog psyco's.xsmhx

Goodell need to stop letting PETA/Dog psyco's bully him into decisions and just leave it up to the NFL TEAMs to decide if he play again by giving him a shot.

2 years and $50 million in lost income is enough.
Reinstate him and move on. xsmhx

I agree with both of you.

That said, if I am an owner of a team, I don't know that I sign him because I don't want all of the distractions but I still think an owner should be able to sign him if he wants. He's done his time.

mrklean
July 20th, 2009, 08:06 PM
It's overkill if he's not reinstated this year.
He's been gone for 2 years so what is the purpose of suspending him all over again going to do except apease the dog psyco's.xsmhx

Goodell need to stop letting PETA/Dog psyco's bully him into decisions and just leave it up to the NFL TEAMs to decide if he play again by giving him a shot.

2 years and $50 million in lost income is enough.
Reinstate him and move on. xsmhx

Well said. Goodell needs to get a damn life and let the man play, I doubt that Vick will get into any more trouble. Prison changes a man and I know it changed him.

89Hen
July 21st, 2009, 11:08 AM
It's overkill if he's not reinstated this year.
He's been gone for 2 years...

2 years and $50 million in lost income is enough.
Reinstate him and move on. xsmhx
Agreed. Time served.

andy7171
July 21st, 2009, 11:27 AM
Redskins have to be front runners for him.

1- Little Danny loves him the big names.

2- Little Danny loves the free publicity Vick would give him on an hourly basis.

3- He's from Tidewater, if they aint gonna root for him no one will.

4- Campbell is out the door next year.

Cobblestone
July 21st, 2009, 11:48 AM
Redskins have to be front runners for him.

1- Little Danny loves him the big names.

2- Little Danny loves the free publicity Vick would give him on an hourly basis.

3- He's from Tidewater, if they aint gonna root for him no one will.

4- Campbell is out the door next year.

But Davis is more of a publicity hound and loves controversy. I say nobody beats Davis to the punch on this one.

89Hen
July 21st, 2009, 11:52 AM
Will "Who Let the Dogs Out" finally be banned from football games if he comes back? xthumbsupx

LacesOut
July 21st, 2009, 12:15 PM
I hope he plays this season. I always enjoyed watching him. Wonder how long it will take him to get into 'football shape'.

Maybe Minnesota will take him?? They have two QB's already, are courting a 3rd one, which really means to me that they feel they have no QB's!

tribe_pride
July 21st, 2009, 12:33 PM
Does anyone think that he should come back not as full-time QB but as another position (not quite sure which one but maybe someone like Westbrook that could line up at RB or WR - and who knows take QB at times too). He probably will be the best athlete on the field (assuming he hasn't lost that over the last 2 years) but he would probably need to be put in to the right offense built for him if he were to play full-time QB.

Not saying that that is right or wrong just throwing it out there.

introvertedGSUfan
July 21st, 2009, 12:54 PM
Does anyone think that he should come back not as full-time QB but as another position (not quite sure which one but maybe someone like Westbrook that could line up at RB or WR - and who knows take QB at times too). He probably will be the best athlete on the field (assuming he hasn't lost that over the last 2 years) but he would probably need to be put in to the right offense built for him if he were to play full-time QB.

Not saying that that is right or wrong just throwing it out there.

I was kind of hoping the Falcons would retain him and use him a few plays per game in a Wildcat package.

andy7171
July 21st, 2009, 01:12 PM
Does anyone think that he should come back not as full-time QB but as another position (not quite sure which one but maybe someone like Westbrook that could line up at RB or WR - and who knows take QB at times too). He probably will be the best athlete on the field (assuming he hasn't lost that over the last 2 years) but he would probably need to be put in to the right offense built for him if he were to play full-time QB.

Not saying that that is right or wrong just throwing it out there.

I'm not so sure he can come back as a QB, at least not at first. I'd like to see him play slot. Quick slants and screens, he could do damage in the open. xthumbsupx

...I think the wildcat gets figured out this year and exposed as the gimmick it is.