DSUrocks07
November 1st, 2008, 08:19 PM
Question for AGS experts:
I for one think that the MEAC should look to expand to 12 football playing schools. (14 total). To be able to split into a divisonal format. (North-South alignment) With the following schools.
MEAC North
1 Delaware State
2 Hampton
3 Howard
4 Morgan State
5 Norfolk State
6 North Carolina A&T
MEAC South
1 Bethune-Cookman
2 Florida A&M
3 South Carolina State
4 Winston-Salem
5 Savannah State*
6 North Carolina Central*
(* denotes potential MEAC-affiliated schools)
IMO this would help with the high travel costs of being such a geographically large conference. (Delaware to Florida) by allowing the schools to schedule regionally and coordinate travel plans more effectively. And it would open up our non-conference slate to other schools instead of having WSSU, NCCU, and SSU counting as our OOCs. Killing our GPI in the process. xnonono2x
From my perspective, playing 5 games against divisional foes and 3 against the other division, leaving 3 (4 in some years) open of OOC games. And also included in the 3 other division games, one would be guaranteed (so some rivalries could be preserved) and the other two would rotate on an annual basis. Does anyone see any potential problems with this?
Any and all comments and opinions welcome. xpeacex
I for one think that the MEAC should look to expand to 12 football playing schools. (14 total). To be able to split into a divisonal format. (North-South alignment) With the following schools.
MEAC North
1 Delaware State
2 Hampton
3 Howard
4 Morgan State
5 Norfolk State
6 North Carolina A&T
MEAC South
1 Bethune-Cookman
2 Florida A&M
3 South Carolina State
4 Winston-Salem
5 Savannah State*
6 North Carolina Central*
(* denotes potential MEAC-affiliated schools)
IMO this would help with the high travel costs of being such a geographically large conference. (Delaware to Florida) by allowing the schools to schedule regionally and coordinate travel plans more effectively. And it would open up our non-conference slate to other schools instead of having WSSU, NCCU, and SSU counting as our OOCs. Killing our GPI in the process. xnonono2x
From my perspective, playing 5 games against divisional foes and 3 against the other division, leaving 3 (4 in some years) open of OOC games. And also included in the 3 other division games, one would be guaranteed (so some rivalries could be preserved) and the other two would rotate on an annual basis. Does anyone see any potential problems with this?
Any and all comments and opinions welcome. xpeacex