DAYTON FLYERS GOING TO THE GRIDIRON CLASSIC!

[FCSFAN]

Clinch the PFL (tied with USD who they already beat) and are going to face the NEC champ in the Gridiron Classic............ POSTSEASON!

GREAT JOB FLYERS!!!

[DetroitFlyer]

Unless the Flyers are invited to the playoffs, then the Gridiron Classic will be played in sunny San Diego.

Dayton Flyers:

10-1, 8-1 FCS, 6-1 PFL, 2007 PFL Champion! Wins over ranked FCS teams Fordham, (2007 Patriot League Champion and playoff participant), and San Diego.

I wonder where our first round game will be played?

GO DAYTON FLYERS!!!!!

[FCSFAN]

I wonder where our first round game will be played?Welcome Stadium vs. the NEC champ.

[BlueHen86]

Congrats Dayton!
Good Luck in the Gridiron Classicxthumbsupx

[GOTOREROS]

Congrats to the Dayton Flyers! They beat USD and deserve the chance to play in either the playoffs or Gridiron Classic.

With the win today at Morehead it makes 3 straight PFL titles for San Diego - quite an accomplishment for the seniors on San Diego. We will have to look at the UC Davis game as our post-season game.

Again, congrats to the Flyers!

[BobbyMo]

Congrats Dayton. Hope i can make it to game.

[Seawolf97]

I strongly expect them to play Albanyxnodx

[Seahawks Fan]

My guess is Albany. Good matchup.

[Boogs]

Unless the Flyers are invited to the playoffs, then the Gridiron Classic will be played in sunny San Diego.

Dayton Flyers:

10-1, 8-1 FCS, 6-1 PFL, 2007 PFL Champion! Wins over ranked FCS teams Fordham, (2007 Patriot League Champion and playoff participant), and San Diego.

I wonder where our first round game will be played?

GO DAYTON FLYERS!!!!!

According to my calculations using a system that currently does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out to preserve sportsmanship issues (no incentive to run up the score), #13 Dayton would travel to #4 North Dakota State.

xcoffeex

NCAA Div. I Football Championship Subdivision

Thru 11/10/2007

Rank | Team | Div. I Football Championship Subdivision Record | Overall Record | Round-Robin Winning Percentage | Bradley-Terry Points
1. Northern Iowa (8-0) (10-0) 0.955 100.000
2. Delaware State (9-0) (9-1) 0.919 50.126
3. Grambling State, LA (8-0) (8-2) 0.914 46.215
4. North Dakota State (8-0) (10-0) 0.892 34.207
5. Montana (9-0) (10-0) 0.887 31.939
6. Yale, CT (9-0) (9-0) 0.878 28.921
7. Southern Illinois (7-1) (9-1) 0.878 28.912
8. Richmond, VA (8-1) (8-2) 0.877 28.473
9. Eastern Kentucky (8-0) (8-2) 0.870 26.181
10. Massachusetts (8-1) (8-2) 0.857 22.840
11. McNeese State, LA (8-0) (10-0) 0.833 18.059
12. James Madison, VA (7-2) (7-3) 0.814 15.181
13. Dayton, OH (mid-major) (8-1) (10-1) 0.802 13.708
14. Delaware (6-2) (8-2) 0.788 12.187
15. Wofford, SC (7-2) (8-3) 0.785 11.920
16. Appalachian State, NC (6-2) (8-2) 0.781 11.535

===========================
teams shutout of the playoffs appear below

17. Villanova, PA (6-3) (6-4) 0.768 10.458
18. San Diego, CA (mid-major) (8-1) (9-1) 0.758 9.678
19. Fordham, NY (8-2) (8-2) 0.750 9.177
20. Alabama A&M (7-2) (8-2) 0.742 8.625
21. Youngstown State, OH (6-3) (7-4) 0.737 8.313
22. Hofstra, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.734 8.163
23. South Carolina State (6-2) (6-4) 0.734 8.137
24. Georgia Southern (6-3) (7-3) 0.730 7.912
25. Elon, NC (5-3) (6-4) 0.714 7.091
26. Norfolk State, VA (6-2) (7-3) 0.711 6.957
27. New Hampshire (5-4) (6-4) 0.707 6.773
28. The Citadel, SC (5-3) (6-4) 0.701 6.486
29. Western Illinois (5-4) (6-5) 0.696 6.296
30. Albany, NY (mid-major) (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.763
31. Colgate, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.751
32. Jackson State, MS (6-3) (6-4) 0.681 5.691
33. Furman, SC (5-4) (5-5) 0.673 5.421
34. Harvard, MA (7-2) (7-2) 0.652 4.753
35. South Dakota State (6-4) (6-4) 0.642 4.474
36. Eastern Illinois (7-2) (7-3) 0.642 4.473
37. Holy Cross, MA (6-4) (6-4) 0.638 4.358
38. Eastern Washington (6-2) (7-3) 0.638 4.352
39. Southern, LA (7-3) (7-3) 0.634 4.253
40. William & Mary, VA (4-5) (4-6) 0.613 3.741
41. Prairie View A&M, TX (6-3) (6-3) 0.610 3.677
42. Missouri State (5-4) (6-5) 0.609 3.659
43. Liberty, VA (5-2) (7-3) 0.588 3.224
44. Hampton, VA (6-4) (6-4) 0.581 3.095
45. Jacksonville State, AL (6-3) (6-4) 0.577 3.024
46. Stony Brook, NY (5-4) (6-4) 0.573 2.961
47. Morehead State, KY (mid-major) (6-3) (7-3) 0.564 2.804
48. Northeastern, MA (3-6) (3-7) 0.560 2.736
49. Maine (4-5) (4-6) 0.558 2.704
50. Sam Houston State, TX (4-3) (6-4) 0.551 2.599
51. Cal Poly, CA (5-3) (6-4) 0.551 2.594
52. Central Arkansas (6-3) (6-4) 0.547 2.542
53. Lehigh, PA (5-5) (5-5) 0.546 2.519
54. Alabama State (5-5) (5-5) 0.545 2.505
55. Illinois State (4-6) (4-7) 0.544 2.489
56. Winston-Salem State, NC (6-4) (6-4) 0.543 2.486
57. Davidson, NC (mid-major) (4-3) (6-4) 0.535 2.373
58. Gardner Webb, NC (5-3) (5-5) 0.532 2.328
59. Northern Arizona (5-4) (6-5) 0.515 2.107
60. Tennessee State (5-5) (5-5) 0.513 2.085
61. Towson, MD (3-7) (3-7) 0.512 2.078
62. Rhode Island (2-7) (2-8) 0.506 2.007
63. UC Davis, CA (4-4) (4-6) 0.506 2.002
64. Lafayette, PA (6-4) (6-4) 0.503 1.963
65. Cornell, NY (5-4) (5-4) 0.492 1.850
66. Drake, IA (mid-major) (4-5) (6-5) 0.489 1.811
67. Arkansas Pine Bluff (3-6) (3-7) 0.487 1.797
68. Chattanooga, TN (2-5) (2-8) 0.481 1.733
69. Nicholls State, LA (3-3) (6-4) 0.480 1.722
70. Brown, RI (4-5) (4-5) 0.469 1.613
71. Texas State (4-4) (4-6) 0.467 1.602
72. Montana State (5-3) (6-4) 0.454 1.483
73. Coastal Carolina, SC (3-6) (4-6) 0.451 1.456
74. Morgan State, MD (5-6) (5-6) 0.447 1.421
75. Weber State, UT (4-4) (5-5) 0.431 1.291
76. Austin Peay, TN (5-4) (6-4) 0.430 1.290
77. Dartmouth, NH (3-6) (3-6) 0.424 1.242
78. Iona, NY (mid-major) (4-2) (7-3) 0.413 1.165
79. Charleston Southern, SC (3-4) (5-5) 0.404 1.099
80. Central Connecticut State (mid-major) (4-3) (6-4) 0.395 1.045
81. Howard, DC (3-5) (4-6) 0.392 1.026
82. Florida A&M (3-7) (3-7) 0.390 1.011
83. Princeton, NJ (3-6) (3-6) 0.385 0.981
84. Bethune Cookman, FL (4-6) (4-6) 0.382 0.966
85. Northwestern State, LA (2-5) (3-7) 0.360 0.843
86. Pennsylvania (3-6) (3-6) 0.343 0.755
87. Duquesne, PA (mid-major) (5-3) (6-3) 0.337 0.726
88. Western Carolina, NC (1-7) (1-9) 0.335 0.719
89. Wagner, NY (mid-major) (5-4) (6-4) 0.328 0.689
90. Alcorn State, MS (2-6) (2-7) 0.326 0.678
91. Presbyterian, SC (3-5) (6-5) 0.324 0.668
92. Valparaiso, IN (mid-major) (2-5) (5-6) 0.322 0.661
93. Samford, AL (3-5) (4-6) 0.316 0.635
94. Mississippi Valley State (2-8) (2-8) 0.314 0.627
95. Portland State, OR (2-7) (2-8) 0.308 0.603
96. Robert Morris, PA (mid-major) (4-6) (4-6) 0.307 0.596
97. Monmouth, NJ (mid-major) (3-6) (3-6) 0.303 0.581
98. Idaho State (2-6) (3-7) 0.302 0.577
99. Sacramento State, CA (2-6) (2-8) 0.298 0.561
100. North Carolina Central (2-2) (6-4) 0.280 0.495
101. Tennessee Martin (3-6) (3-7) 0.278 0.488
102. Tennessee Tech (2-5) (4-6) 0.270 0.464
103. Jacksonville, FL (mid-major) (2-7) (3-7) 0.270 0.461
104. Bucknell, PA (2-8) (2-8) 0.235 0.357
105. Northern Colorado (1-8) (1-10) 0.212 0.296
106. St. Francis, PA (mid-major) (2-7) (2-7) 0.209 0.290
107. VMI, VA (1-8) (2-8) 0.207 0.285
108. Southeastern Louisiana (1-5) (2-8) 0.206 0.283
109. Columbia, NY (1-8) (1-8) 0.179 0.223
110. Southern Utah (0-9) (0-10) 0.175 0.213
111. Marist, NY (mid-major) (3-8) (3-8) 0.160 0.186
112. Georgetown, DC (1-10) (1-10) 0.157 0.180
113. Murray State, KY (1-7) (2-8) 0.155 0.176
114. Sacred Heart, CT (mid-major) (2-8) (3-8) 0.128 0.132
115. Texas Southern (0-8) (0-9) 0.118 0.117
116. Southeast Missouri State (1-7) (2-8) 0.108 0.103
117. Savannah State, GA (0-5) (1-8) 0.105 0.100
118. Butler, IN (mid-major) (0-7) (4-7) 0.105 0.099
119. Stephen F. Austin, TX (0-9) (0-10) 0.098 0.090
120. North Carolina A&T (0-10) (0-10) 0.084 0.073
121. Indiana State (0-9) (0-11) 0.070 0.058
122. La Salle, PA (mid-major) (0-5) (0-9) 0.045 0.034
Fictitious Team 1.934


Don't blame the rankings. Blame the administrators that allow games outside of FCS to be played. Grambling played two FBS teams and lost to them. Substitute those two games against a Sagarin top 25 team in FCS and a single loss drops Grambling like a rock just like it happened to Iona earlier in the year.

The NCAA's solution? If your school plays D1 basketball you get to be FCS and you don't have to play a schedule made up entirely of FCS opponents. Stupidity.

[Syntax Error]

... does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out ... Checkout my screwy FCS computer rankings.Fixed it for you. xlolx

[USDFAN_55]

According to my calculations using a system that currently does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out to preserve sportsmanship issues (no incentive to run up the score), #13 Dayton would travel to #4 North Dakota State.

xcoffeex

NCAA Div. I Football Championship Subdivision

Thru 11/10/2007

Rank | Team | Div. I Football Championship Subdivision Record | Overall Record | Round-Robin Winning Percentage | Bradley-Terry Points
1. Northern Iowa (8-0) (10-0) 0.955 100.000
2. Delaware State (9-0) (9-1) 0.919 50.126
3. Grambling State, LA (8-0) (8-2) 0.914 46.215
4. North Dakota State (8-0) (10-0) 0.892 34.207
5. Montana (9-0) (10-0) 0.887 31.939
6. Yale, CT (9-0) (9-0) 0.878 28.921
7. Southern Illinois (7-1) (9-1) 0.878 28.912
8. Richmond, VA (8-1) (8-2) 0.877 28.473
9. Eastern Kentucky (8-0) (8-2) 0.870 26.181
10. Massachusetts (8-1) (8-2) 0.857 22.840
11. McNeese State, LA (8-0) (10-0) 0.833 18.059
12. James Madison, VA (7-2) (7-3) 0.814 15.181
13. Dayton, OH (mid-major) (8-1) (10-1) 0.802 13.708
14. Delaware (6-2) (8-2) 0.788 12.187
15. Wofford, SC (7-2) (8-3) 0.785 11.920
16. Appalachian State, NC (6-2) (8-2) 0.781 11.535

===========================
teams shutout of the playoffs appear below

17. Villanova, PA (6-3) (6-4) 0.768 10.458
18. San Diego, CA (mid-major) (8-1) (9-1) 0.758 9.678
19. Fordham, NY (8-2) (8-2) 0.750 9.177
20. Alabama A&M (7-2) (8-2) 0.742 8.625
21. Youngstown State, OH (6-3) (7-4) 0.737 8.313
22. Hofstra, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.734 8.163
23. South Carolina State (6-2) (6-4) 0.734 8.137
24. Georgia Southern (6-3) (7-3) 0.730 7.912
25. Elon, NC (5-3) (6-4) 0.714 7.091
26. Norfolk State, VA (6-2) (7-3) 0.711 6.957
27. New Hampshire (5-4) (6-4) 0.707 6.773
28. The Citadel, SC (5-3) (6-4) 0.701 6.486
29. Western Illinois (5-4) (6-5) 0.696 6.296
30. Albany, NY (mid-major) (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.763
31. Colgate, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.751
32. Jackson State, MS (6-3) (6-4) 0.681 5.691
33. Furman, SC (5-4) (5-5) 0.673 5.421
34. Harvard, MA (7-2) (7-2) 0.652 4.753
35. South Dakota State (6-4) (6-4) 0.642 4.474
36. Eastern Illinois (7-2) (7-3) 0.642 4.473
37. Holy Cross, MA (6-4) (6-4) 0.638 4.358
38. Eastern Washington (6-2) (7-3) 0.638 4.352
39. Southern, LA (7-3) (7-3) 0.634 4.253
40. William & Mary, VA (4-5) (4-6) 0.613 3.741


Don't blame the rankings. Blame the administrators that allow games outside of FCS to be played. Grambling played two FBS teams and lost to them. Substitute those two games against a Sagarin top 25 team in FCS and a single loss drops Grambling like a rock just like it happened to Iona earlier in the year.

The NCAA's solution? If your school plays D1 basketball you get to be FCS and you don't have to play a schedule made up entirely of FCS opponents. Stupidity.

Grambling has the southern classic, North Dakota State s not eligible for the play-offs, and Yale doesn't participate in the play-offs. You would have to at least take those three teams out of your play-off eligible teams to have any sliver of credibility.

[Syntax Error]

Grambling has the southern classic, North Dakota State s not eligible for the play-offs, and Yale doesn't participate in the play-offs. You would have to at least take those three teams out of your play-off eligible teams to have any sliver of credibility.Don't think you have to consider credibility with this ranking. xlolx

[Boogs]

Don't think you have to consider credibility with this ranking. xlolx

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi

Back at ya, dude.

[BlueHen86]

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi

Back at ya, dude.
Yeah, but you are going in the opposite direction.

"You lost, we fought with you, now were ridiculing you, next we'll ignore you." - Mahatma Coat:D

[danefan]

hahaha....
and Boogs being banned is bad for whom?

[Syntax Error]

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
Back at ya, dude.Boogs, nothing personal. Your ranking is not credible.

[flyenhigh]

Is the game going to be televised like last year???????

[grizband]

[QUOTE=Boogs;734689]According to my calculations using a system that currently does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out to preserve sportsmanship issues (no incentive to run up the score), #13 Dayton would travel to #4 North Dakota State.

That sure is a lot of "ifs." Because of regional limitations, I'm not sure how you will ever be able to require that FCS schools play only teams from the same classification.

[th0m]

Nice ranking system xlolx Besides the obvious ineligible teams you're including in the playoffs, just a reminder that the Patriot League has an auto-bid which would mean #19 Fordham also gets to go to the playoffs, bumping a team formerly included.

[JohnStOnge]

According to my calculations using a system that currently does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out to preserve sportsmanship issues (no incentive to run up the score), #13 Dayton would travel to #4 North Dakota State.

xcoffeex .

I need to make sure that I get your final rankings after this season so I can evaluate their performance. I think I'll compare them to Sagarin, Massey, and Dunkel. If you keep a record of what your rankings have been week by week so I can evaluate them in terms of prediction that would be optimum. If not, I'll see how well they did in terms of retrodiction.

[USDFAN_55]

Nice ranking system xlolx Besides the obvious ineligible teams you're including in the playoffs, just a reminder that the Patriot League has an auto-bid which would mean #19 Fordham also gets to go to the playoffs, bumping a team formerly included.

The ineligible teams were already pointed out to him, but he did state that AQ teams would not be considered in his rankingsxreadx

[danefan]

Is the game going to be televised like last year???????

Not sure. From what I understand Monmouth had a lot to do with getting CSTV to televise it last year. I hope it is televised.

The NEC crew that does Fox Sports coverage is pretty good. Just send them and put it on FCS.

[lizrdgizrd]

According to my calculations using a system that currently does not require FCS schools to play virtually only FCS schools (which it should like we have required in D3) and if the season ended today and if automatic bids were not part of the system, and if final score margins were thrown out to preserve sportsmanship issues (no incentive to run up the score), #13 Dayton would travel to #4 North Dakota State.

xcoffeex

NCAA Div. I Football Championship Subdivision

Thru 11/10/2007

Rank | Team | Div. I Football Championship Subdivision Record | Overall Record | Round-Robin Winning Percentage | Bradley-Terry Points
1. Northern Iowa (8-0) (10-0) 0.955 100.000
2. Delaware State (9-0) (9-1) 0.919 50.126
3. Grambling State, LA (8-0) (8-2) 0.914 46.215
4. North Dakota State (8-0) (10-0) 0.892 34.207
5. Montana (9-0) (10-0) 0.887 31.939
6. Yale, CT (9-0) (9-0) 0.878 28.921
7. Southern Illinois (7-1) (9-1) 0.878 28.912
8. Richmond, VA (8-1) (8-2) 0.877 28.473
9. Eastern Kentucky (8-0) (8-2) 0.870 26.181
10. Massachusetts (8-1) (8-2) 0.857 22.840
11. McNeese State, LA (8-0) (10-0) 0.833 18.059
12. James Madison, VA (7-2) (7-3) 0.814 15.181
13. Dayton, OH (mid-major) (8-1) (10-1) 0.802 13.708
14. Delaware (6-2) (8-2) 0.788 12.187
15. Wofford, SC (7-2) (8-3) 0.785 11.920
16. Appalachian State, NC (6-2) (8-2) 0.781 11.535

===========================
teams shutout of the playoffs appear below

17. Villanova, PA (6-3) (6-4) 0.768 10.458
18. San Diego, CA (mid-major) (8-1) (9-1) 0.758 9.678
19. Fordham, NY (8-2) (8-2) 0.750 9.177
20. Alabama A&M (7-2) (8-2) 0.742 8.625
21. Youngstown State, OH (6-3) (7-4) 0.737 8.313
22. Hofstra, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.734 8.163
23. South Carolina State (6-2) (6-4) 0.734 8.137
24. Georgia Southern (6-3) (7-3) 0.730 7.912
25. Elon, NC (5-3) (6-4) 0.714 7.091
26. Norfolk State, VA (6-2) (7-3) 0.711 6.957
27. New Hampshire (5-4) (6-4) 0.707 6.773
28. The Citadel, SC (5-3) (6-4) 0.701 6.486
29. Western Illinois (5-4) (6-5) 0.696 6.296
30. Albany, NY (mid-major) (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.763
31. Colgate, NY (7-3) (7-3) 0.682 5.751
32. Jackson State, MS (6-3) (6-4) 0.681 5.691
33. Furman, SC (5-4) (5-5) 0.673 5.421
34. Harvard, MA (7-2) (7-2) 0.652 4.753
35. South Dakota State (6-4) (6-4) 0.642 4.474
36. Eastern Illinois (7-2) (7-3) 0.642 4.473
37. Holy Cross, MA (6-4) (6-4) 0.638 4.358
38. Eastern Washington (6-2) (7-3) 0.638 4.352
39. Southern, LA (7-3) (7-3) 0.634 4.253
40. William & Mary, VA (4-5) (4-6) 0.613 3.741
41. Prairie View A&M, TX (6-3) (6-3) 0.610 3.677
42. Missouri State (5-4) (6-5) 0.609 3.659
43. Liberty, VA (5-2) (7-3) 0.588 3.224
44. Hampton, VA (6-4) (6-4) 0.581 3.095
45. Jacksonville State, AL (6-3) (6-4) 0.577 3.024
46. Stony Brook, NY (5-4) (6-4) 0.573 2.961
47. Morehead State, KY (mid-major) (6-3) (7-3) 0.564 2.804
48. Northeastern, MA (3-6) (3-7) 0.560 2.736
49. Maine (4-5) (4-6) 0.558 2.704
50. Sam Houston State, TX (4-3) (6-4) 0.551 2.599
51. Cal Poly, CA (5-3) (6-4) 0.551 2.594
52. Central Arkansas (6-3) (6-4) 0.547 2.542
53. Lehigh, PA (5-5) (5-5) 0.546 2.519
54. Alabama State (5-5) (5-5) 0.545 2.505
55. Illinois State (4-6) (4-7) 0.544 2.489
56. Winston-Salem State, NC (6-4) (6-4) 0.543 2.486
57. Davidson, NC (mid-major) (4-3) (6-4) 0.535 2.373
58. Gardner Webb, NC (5-3) (5-5) 0.532 2.328
59. Northern Arizona (5-4) (6-5) 0.515 2.107
60. Tennessee State (5-5) (5-5) 0.513 2.085
61. Towson, MD (3-7) (3-7) 0.512 2.078
62. Rhode Island (2-7) (2-8) 0.506 2.007
63. UC Davis, CA (4-4) (4-6) 0.506 2.002
64. Lafayette, PA (6-4) (6-4) 0.503 1.963
65. Cornell, NY (5-4) (5-4) 0.492 1.850
66. Drake, IA (mid-major) (4-5) (6-5) 0.489 1.811
67. Arkansas Pine Bluff (3-6) (3-7) 0.487 1.797
68. Chattanooga, TN (2-5) (2-8) 0.481 1.733
69. Nicholls State, LA (3-3) (6-4) 0.480 1.722
70. Brown, RI (4-5) (4-5) 0.469 1.613
71. Texas State (4-4) (4-6) 0.467 1.602
72. Montana State (5-3) (6-4) 0.454 1.483
73. Coastal Carolina, SC (3-6) (4-6) 0.451 1.456
74. Morgan State, MD (5-6) (5-6) 0.447 1.421
75. Weber State, UT (4-4) (5-5) 0.431 1.291
76. Austin Peay, TN (5-4) (6-4) 0.430 1.290
77. Dartmouth, NH (3-6) (3-6) 0.424 1.242
78. Iona, NY (mid-major) (4-2) (7-3) 0.413 1.165
79. Charleston Southern, SC (3-4) (5-5) 0.404 1.099
80. Central Connecticut State (mid-major) (4-3) (6-4) 0.395 1.045
81. Howard, DC (3-5) (4-6) 0.392 1.026
82. Florida A&M (3-7) (3-7) 0.390 1.011
83. Princeton, NJ (3-6) (3-6) 0.385 0.981
84. Bethune Cookman, FL (4-6) (4-6) 0.382 0.966
85. Northwestern State, LA (2-5) (3-7) 0.360 0.843
86. Pennsylvania (3-6) (3-6) 0.343 0.755
87. Duquesne, PA (mid-major) (5-3) (6-3) 0.337 0.726
88. Western Carolina, NC (1-7) (1-9) 0.335 0.719
89. Wagner, NY (mid-major) (5-4) (6-4) 0.328 0.689
90. Alcorn State, MS (2-6) (2-7) 0.326 0.678
91. Presbyterian, SC (3-5) (6-5) 0.324 0.668
92. Valparaiso, IN (mid-major) (2-5) (5-6) 0.322 0.661
93. Samford, AL (3-5) (4-6) 0.316 0.635
94. Mississippi Valley State (2-8) (2-8) 0.314 0.627
95. Portland State, OR (2-7) (2-8) 0.308 0.603
96. Robert Morris, PA (mid-major) (4-6) (4-6) 0.307 0.596
97. Monmouth, NJ (mid-major) (3-6) (3-6) 0.303 0.581
98. Idaho State (2-6) (3-7) 0.302 0.577
99. Sacramento State, CA (2-6) (2-8) 0.298 0.561
100. North Carolina Central (2-2) (6-4) 0.280 0.495
101. Tennessee Martin (3-6) (3-7) 0.278 0.488
102. Tennessee Tech (2-5) (4-6) 0.270 0.464
103. Jacksonville, FL (mid-major) (2-7) (3-7) 0.270 0.461
104. Bucknell, PA (2-8) (2-8) 0.235 0.357
105. Northern Colorado (1-8) (1-10) 0.212 0.296
106. St. Francis, PA (mid-major) (2-7) (2-7) 0.209 0.290
107. VMI, VA (1-8) (2-8) 0.207 0.285
108. Southeastern Louisiana (1-5) (2-8) 0.206 0.283
109. Columbia, NY (1-8) (1-8) 0.179 0.223
110. Southern Utah (0-9) (0-10) 0.175 0.213
111. Marist, NY (mid-major) (3-8) (3-8) 0.160 0.186
112. Georgetown, DC (1-10) (1-10) 0.157 0.180
113. Murray State, KY (1-7) (2-8) 0.155 0.176
114. Sacred Heart, CT (mid-major) (2-8) (3-8) 0.128 0.132
115. Texas Southern (0-8) (0-9) 0.118 0.117
116. Southeast Missouri State (1-7) (2-8) 0.108 0.103
117. Savannah State, GA (0-5) (1-8) 0.105 0.100
118. Butler, IN (mid-major) (0-7) (4-7) 0.105 0.099
119. Stephen F. Austin, TX (0-9) (0-10) 0.098 0.090
120. North Carolina A&T (0-10) (0-10) 0.084 0.073
121. Indiana State (0-9) (0-11) 0.070 0.058
122. La Salle, PA (mid-major) (0-5) (0-9) 0.045 0.034
Fictitious Team 1.934


Don't blame the rankings. Blame the administrators that allow games outside of FCS to be played. Grambling played two FBS teams and lost to them. Substitute those two games against a Sagarin top 25 team in FCS and a single loss drops Grambling like a rock just like it happened to Iona earlier in the year.

The NCAA's solution? If your school plays D1 basketball you get to be FCS and you don't have to play a schedule made up entirely of FCS opponents. Stupidity.

So now you're so tired of ridicule that you hide your rankings inside another thread? xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx

[BlueHen86]

So now you're so tired of ridicule that you hide your rankings inside another thread? xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx xlolx
What he ought to do is start a "Burka" thread in the lounge and then post his "rankings" there. That way no one will see them.

[necfootballfan]

I dont understand why noone gives ccsu any respect to play in the gridiron bowl. Every thinks albany is going to over power them when ccsu matches up better with them than any other team. CCSU WILL WIN SATURDAY AND PLAY DAYTON IN THE GRIDIRON BOWL

[griz_fan_in_SanDiego]

Good luck Dayton!

[griz_fan_in_SanDiego]

Good Luck Dayton!

[ursus arctos horribilis]

What he ought to do is start a "Burka" thread in the lounge and then post his "rankings" there. That way no one will see them.

I would check it out though as I can go through a hundred unsexy burka pics to find that one sexy one.

[danefan]

I dont understand why noone gives ccsu any respect to play in the gridiron bowl. Every thinks albany is going to over power them when ccsu matches up better with them than any other team. CCSU WILL WIN SATURDAY AND PLAY DAYTON IN THE GRIDIRON BOWL

Everyone thinks it because Albany has proven to be the favorite so far. Being undefeated in league play with a margin of victory of about 30 or so a game. How can Central be anything but the underdog?

[Seahawks Fan]

I dont understand why noone gives ccsu any respect to play in the gridiron bowl. Every thinks albany is going to over power them when ccsu matches up better with them than any other team. CCSU WILL WIN SATURDAY AND PLAY DAYTON IN THE GRIDIRON BOWL

We lost to both these teams this year. We could have beatedn CCSU. One big play took us out of the game. Albany dominated us.