View Full Version : Peter Kings' QB Rankings
spelunker64
June 18th, 2007, 11:51 AM
From Manning to Croyle. I think he nailed it.
It's been a little boring around the NFL over the last month or so. Lots of off-the-field crappola going on, but not much to sink your football teeth into. Here's my attempt to stir things up. It's the first MMQB Quarterback Ratings.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/06/17/qbs/index.html
813Jag
June 18th, 2007, 12:04 PM
From Manning to Croyle. I think he nailed it.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/06/17/qbs/index.html
It's show and prove time for Romo. This is his first full season and all eyes are on him. Especially when you look at his play the last few weeks of the season in '06.
spelunker64
June 18th, 2007, 12:10 PM
Yeah, Romo might be a little high on the list.
spelunker64
June 18th, 2007, 12:15 PM
Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me
Pepsi has introduced cucumber soda in Japan.
Seems the company thinks people will find cucumber soda an alluring way to beat the heat this summer.
Another thing I got from the article...
seantaylor
June 18th, 2007, 03:05 PM
Brady is better than Manning. Vince Young is way too high on that list.
UNHWildCats
June 18th, 2007, 04:05 PM
Brady is better than Manning. Vince Young is way too high on that list.
Agreed. If Brady had even half the talent at WR that Manning does that comeback in the AFC Championship wouldnt have happened, thus eliminating King's reasoning for Manning over Brady.
Now that Brady will finally have a WR group that will rival what Manning has it will be interesting to see how the two stack up.
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 05:27 PM
Brady is better than Manning. Vince Young is way too high on that list.
Agreed. If Brady had even half the talent at WR that Manning does that comeback in the AFC Championship wouldnt have happened, thus eliminating King's reasoning for Manning over Brady.
Now that Brady will finally have a WR group that will rival what Manning has it will be interesting to see how the two stack up.
xhomerx xhomerx xbangx xbangx
If Brady had half the talent that Manning does, and worked half as hard as him, he would be a better QB! Also, if Brady had had the terrible defenses that Manning had those few years, he wouldn't have any rings!
UNHWildCats
June 18th, 2007, 07:37 PM
xhomerx xhomerx xbangx xbangx
If Brady had half the talent that Manning does, and worked half as hard as him, he would be a better QB! Also, if Brady had had the terrible defenses that Manning had those few years, he wouldn't have any rings!
Are you suggesting that Brady dont work hard?
Funny since of the two Brady earned his spot by playing tough winning football when he had a shot, while Manning was drafted and handed the keys to the car immediatly.
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 09:07 PM
Are you suggesting that Brady dont work hard?
Funny since of the two Brady earned his spot by playing tough winning football when he had a shot, while Manning was drafted and handed the keys to the car immediatly.
And turned a 1-15 team into a Superbowl winning one. True, it wasn't all by himself, but he played a huge part in it. Manning probably spends twice as much time in the film room as Brady, which is largely what sets him apart from other QBs in the league, and why it's so hard for defenses to stop him. Brady is in it for the money and the playboy lifestyle, and he just happened to be paired with a genius of a coach and an outstanding defense.
UNHWildCats
June 18th, 2007, 09:22 PM
And turned a 1-15 team into a Superbowl winning one. True, it wasn't all by himself, but he played a huge part in it. Manning probably spends twice as much time in the film room as Brady, which is largely what sets him apart from other QBs in the league, and why it's so hard for defenses to stop him. Brady is in it for the money and the playboy lifestyle, and he just happened to be paired with a genius of a coach and an outstanding defense.
It took him 9 years to get to the SB let alone winning it.... Brady took a 6-10 team to the super bowl in his 1st season playing... and oh ya in that first season beat Manning twice by a combined 82-30
Cleets
June 18th, 2007, 09:41 PM
xhomerx xhomerx xbangx xbangx
If Brady had half the talent that Manning does, and worked half as hard as him, he would be a better QB! Also, if Brady had had the terrible defenses that Manning had those few years, he wouldn't have any rings!
Hmm... xeyebrowx
(okey-dokey)
Apparently they've been handing out Super Bowl Rings at the K-Mart...xwhistlex
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 09:41 PM
Again, look at the coach and defense Brady had in his first few seasons, and compare them to the defenses Manning had, not to mention Jim Mora...
Cleets
June 18th, 2007, 09:43 PM
Again, look at the coach and defense Brady had in his first few seasons, and compare them to the defenses Manning had, not to mention Jim Mora...
Who had more first round drafts on ther team than the Dolts.. Nobody they were talent loaded.. Lame excuse...
Marcus Garvey
June 18th, 2007, 09:49 PM
Sometime ago, Peter King turned into a name-dropping f#@!ktard. He stopped giving accurate analysis based upon observation in order to hob-knob with NFL players and become their "buddy."
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 09:51 PM
Hmm... xeyebrowx
(okey-dokey)
Apparently they've been handing out Super Bowl Rings at the K-Mart...xwhistlex
Ok, make the case that Brady is a better pure quarterback, not just one who has more sb rings. If you make the argument that rings alone make a quarterback great, then Trent Dilfer would be a better qb than Marino.
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 09:53 PM
Who had more first round drafts on ther team than the Dolts.. Nobody they were talent loaded.. Lame excuse...
On offense, on offense, on offense.xbangx xbangx Remember how bad his defense was, even during the last regular season? Are you telling me Marino wouldn't have won a super bowl with a defense of the caliber that new england had?
UNHWildCats
June 18th, 2007, 10:05 PM
Again, look at the coach and defense Brady had in his first few seasons, and compare them to the defenses Manning had, not to mention Jim Mora...
Ya cause you know Belichick was such a succesful coach before Brady came along.... He was fired in Cleveland and had PAtriots fans scratching their heads when Kraft gave up draft picks to get him from New York.
I could care less about the defense angle. Because if Brady ahd the WRs that Manning has had New England would have won Super Bowls XXXVI, XXXVII, XVIII, XXXIX, XL and XLI.
Manning needed to face the Patriots team with its worst receiving corps of the Brady era to finally get past him.
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 10:52 PM
Ya cause you know Belichick was such a succesful coach before Brady came along.... He was fired in Cleveland and had PAtriots fans scratching their heads when Kraft gave up draft picks to get him from New York.
I could care less about the defense angle. Because if Brady ahd the WRs that Manning has had New England would have won Super Bowls XXXVI, XXXVII, XVIII, XXXIX, XL and XLI.
Manning needed to face the Patriots team with its worst receiving corps of the Brady era to finally get past him.
What happened to defense winning championships? All quarterbacks are given far too much credit for winnng Superbowls, it takes a tremendous team effort to pull it off. And if I remember correctly, Deon Branch and Troy Brown were pretty good receivers.
UNHWildCats
June 18th, 2007, 11:23 PM
What happened to defense winning championships? All quarterbacks are given far too much credit for winnng Superbowls, it takes a tremendous team effort to pull it off. And if I remember correctly, Deon Branch and Troy Brown were pretty good receivers.
Super Bowl XXXVIII was hardly a defensive game. Not every game is won with defense.
2001 Team
| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Troy Brown (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BrowTr00.htm) | 16 | 11 91 8.3 0 | 101 1199 11.9 5 |
| Fred Coleman (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/ColeFr00.htm) | 7 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 2 50 25.0 0 |
| Bert Emanuel (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/EmanBe00.htm) | 2 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 4 25 6.2 0 |
| Terry Glenn (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/GlenTe00.htm) | 4 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 14 204 14.6 1 |
| Charles Johnson (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/JohnCh00.htm) | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 14 111 7.9 1 |
| David Patten (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/PattDa00.htm) | 16 | 5 67 13.4 1 | 51 749 14.7 4 |
| Torrance Small (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/SmalTo00.htm) | 2 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 4 29 7.2 0
2003 team
| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Deion Branch (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BranDe00.htm) | 15 | 1 11 11.0 0 | 57 803 14.1 3 |
| Troy Brown (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BrowTr00.htm) | 12 | 6 27 4.5 0 | 40 472 11.8 4 |
| David Givens (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/GiveDa00.htm) | 13 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 34 510 15.0 6 |
| Bethel Johnson (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/JohnBe00.htm) | 15 | 1 -12 -12.0 0 | 16 209 13.1 2 |
| David Patten (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/PattDa00.htm) | 6 | 1 4 4.0 0 | 9 140 15.6 0 |
| J.J. Stokes (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/StokJ.00.htm) | 7 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 15 154 10.3 0 |
| Dedric Ward (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/WardDe00.htm) | 14 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 7 106 15.1 1 ]
2004 team
| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Deion Branch (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BranDe00.htm) | 9 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 35 454 13.0 4 |
| Troy Brown (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BrowTr00.htm) | 12 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 17 184 10.8 1 |
| David Givens (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/GiveDa00.htm) | 15 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 56 874 15.6 3 |
| Bethel Johnson (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/JohnBe00.htm) | 13 | 2 8 4.0 0 | 10 174 17.4 1 |
| David Patten (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/PattDa00.htm) | 16 | 1 5 5.0 0 | 44 800 18.2 7
Brown in 2001 was the only WR that could compare to what Manning had. After that with him playing on defense a lot it took away from his offensive side of the game.
Grizalltheway
June 18th, 2007, 11:49 PM
Don't get me wrong, Brady is a great QB and a great leader, and I'll admit that he's cooler under pressure, but right now I give Manning the slight edge as the better overall QB, now that he has the combination of incredible numbers and a super bowl ring. And again, you have to give a lot of the credit to his defense with the way they stepped up in the playoffs.
UNHWildCats
June 19th, 2007, 12:09 AM
Oh now were claiming Peyton is #1 cause he won a SB????
Manning 92-52 .639 (7-6 .538 Playoffs) 1 Super Bowl win
Brady 70-24 .745 (12-2 .857 Playoffs) 3 Super Bowl wins
I dont see how that lone SB win equates to the better QB???
Grizalltheway
June 19th, 2007, 12:40 AM
Oh now were claiming Peyton is #1 cause he won a SB????
Manning 92-52 .639 (7-6 .538 Playoffs) 1 Super Bowl win
Brady 70-24 .745 (12-2 .857 Playoffs) 3 Super Bowl wins
I dont see how that lone SB win equates to the better QB???
Do I have to start with all the passing records he already holds? Regular season numbers aren't everything, but they are a good indication of how talented and accurate of a passer he is. Again, Super Bowl rings aren't everything, Trent Dilfer isn't a better QB than Dan Marino. Robbert Horry has 7 NBA championships, does that mean he's almost as good as Bill Russell? Of course not, he shows up and makes big shots in the playoffs, and that's about it. If we're talking about the most clutch QB right now, that of course goes to Brady, but as far as overall talent and skill, that goes to Manning. To me, he didn't need to win a SB to be considered one of the best QBs ever, but it will go a long way in silencing his haters.
*takes deep breath*
spelunker64
June 20th, 2007, 07:55 AM
Holy Brady vs. Manning Batman.
You have to remember this list is ranking how the QBs will do in 2007. Manning is 1 game removed from beating Brady so he should get the nod.
Eyes of Old Main
June 20th, 2007, 08:13 AM
Vince Young is way too high on that list.
I agree. No way he's better than Rivers at this point.
813Jag
June 20th, 2007, 09:32 AM
I agree. No way he's better than Rivers at this point.
I think Young is in for a rough year. I think defenses will be ready for him.
UNHWILDCATS05
June 20th, 2007, 09:40 AM
Brady is in it for the money and the playboy lifestyle, and he just happened to be paired with a genius of a coach and an outstanding defense.
So... the fact that Brady has restructured his contract numerous times (including taking a pay cut the first time) shows that he is in it for the money??? No, it shows he is in it to win... and also, have you seen how many commercials manning has done... and he is not in it for the money??? Sureee
GeauxLions94
June 20th, 2007, 09:57 AM
Drew Brees at No. 3 .... good enough for me xthumbsupx
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.