View Full Version : ETSU football update
Mountaineer
March 21st, 2007, 04:07 PM
Good news for Bucs fans! xnodx
JOHNSON CITY, Tenn. (March 20, 2007) - With two weeks to spare, East Tennessee State University President Dr. Paul E. Stanton, Jr., announced Tuesday that the university has reached his preliminary goal of raising $300,000 in financial support for a new football program.
With 390 donors coming together to support the vision for a new football program, Stanton said it sends a message to students who are preparing for a referendum vote April 10th and 11th to decide whether a new athletic fee should be instituted to support such a program.
"Our alumni and community supporters have certainly sent a clear message by meeting our $300,000 goal with two weeks to spare," said Stanton, who had originally set a deadline of March 31 to meet this initial plateau. "As our students prepare to vote on a new athletic fee later this spring, it is obvious that many people who support ETSU are behind this effort and wish to see it succeed. As I said in December, we still have a long way to go before we reach the end zone, but we've certainly moved the ball with this announcement."
http://www.starhq.com/html/sports/articles/articles.asp?day=Wednesday&article=sp-etsufootball.html
dbackjon
March 21st, 2007, 04:09 PM
xhurrayx
mcveyrl
March 21st, 2007, 05:11 PM
This included $40,000 given by a group of former players...
rokamortis
March 21st, 2007, 05:40 PM
Good for them.
I bet the SoCon gets ETSU back, but if not the Big South would love to get them.
catamount man
March 21st, 2007, 05:44 PM
WAY TO ETSU!!!! I want these guys back in the SoCon real bad!
GO CATAMOUNTS!!!
appfan2008
March 21st, 2007, 05:45 PM
I would much rather have ETSU join us in the SOCON than Samford!
PaladinFan
March 21st, 2007, 06:26 PM
Just as long as that Tim Smith guy graduated in basketball. That guy is flat out the best ball handling point guard I've ever seen regardless of classification.
Fresno St. Alum
March 21st, 2007, 07:33 PM
SoCon wants them? If not then they would probably go the the OVC.
Sly Fox
March 21st, 2007, 11:13 PM
What makes you say that, FSA? Folks in Jonson City don't seem to have that attitude.
Mr. C
March 21st, 2007, 11:24 PM
Just as long as that Tim Smith guy graduated in basketball. That guy is flat out the best ball handling point guard I've ever seen regardless of classification.
You obviously didn't see the other side of Tim Smith, who graduated in 2006. Without Zakee Wadood and Jerald Fields in the lineup, Smith had pretty terrible years as a junior and senior. Ironically, the Bucs won the A-Sun title without him this season and advanced to the NIT. Smith was a good big-game player, but he also had some of the worst games I've ever seen a point guard have at other times. He was extremely inconsistent.
Back to football, it's too bad that ETSU ended its program when it did. I would have loved to see Wadood and Fields follow through on their thoughts of playing football after their senior basketball season.
Mr. C
March 21st, 2007, 11:25 PM
Sources I've talked to in the SoCon seem to think bringing ETSU back would be a no-brainer, once the Bucs reestablish football.
Mountaineer
March 21st, 2007, 11:32 PM
Sources I've talked to in the SoCon seem to think bringing ETSU back would be a no-brainer, once the Bucs reestablish football.
That'd be fantastic Mr. C. Good news indeed - just hope the Bucs can pull it off! xrotatehx
PaladinFan
March 22nd, 2007, 12:33 AM
You obviously didn't see the other side of Tim Smith, who graduated in 2006. Without Zakee Wadood and Jerald Fields in the lineup, Smith had pretty terrible years as a junior and senior. Ironically, the Bucs won the A-Sun title without him this season and advanced to the NIT. Smith was a good big-game player, but he also had some of the worst games I've ever seen a point guard have at other times. He was extremely inconsistent.
Back to football, it's too bad that ETSU ended its program when it did. I would have loved to see Wadood and Fields follow through on their thoughts of playing football after their senior basketball season.
Said he was the best ball handler I've ever seen. You forget about ETSU nearly upsetting #2 Wake in the tournament riding Smith's back.
youwouldno
March 22nd, 2007, 12:41 AM
Sources I've talked to in the SoCon seem to think bringing ETSU back would be a no-brainer, once the Bucs reestablish football.
Wouldn't that kind of make for a weird league size? The football schedule would no longer be round-robin, the basketball divisions go back to being uneven, etc. Taking back ETSU would seem to me only desirable in a scheme to establish a division setup in football, a la CAA.
Here would be a small version, with Samford and the hypothetical ETSU.
e.g.:
North
App St
WCU
Elon
Furman
Wofford
South
UTC
Samford
ETSU
GSU
Citadel
Not bad. Teams would skip one team from the opposing division per year. Pain in the butt for the committee, of course, because league schedules would then require more scrutiny.
For a 'big' league possibility, take the above and add another program to each division, from Hampton, SC St, JSU, CCU, etc., obviously it's hard to say exactly who would be targeted and/or receptive. That could prompt another basketball only member (UNC-W often speculated). 12 football/16 basketball.
I prefer the round-robin aspect of a league with less than 10 members, personally. The big league format seems to work for the CAA, though.
Mr. C
March 22nd, 2007, 12:47 AM
I'm not sure how the SoCon would manage the size thing. It might bring another team in to balance things and then go to division play for football. Jacksonville State would be an interesting addition, giving Samford a travel partner (UTC and ETSU could be travel partners as well in basketball). A basketball-only member would work nicely, too (as you pointed out).
Mr. C
March 22nd, 2007, 12:50 AM
Said he was the best ball handler I've ever seen. You forget about ETSU nearly upsetting #2 Wake in the tournament riding Smith's back.
Didn't forget that at all. I watched the games in the NCAAs against Wake Forest and Cincinnnati. Like I said, he was very good in BIG games (SoCon and NCAA tournaments, that SoCon regular-season championship game with App State a few years back), but he had some struggles too.
appfan2008
March 22nd, 2007, 01:03 AM
I'm not sure how the SoCon would manage the size thing. It might bring another team in to balance things and then go to division play for football. Jacksonville State would be an interesting addition, giving Samford a travel partner (UTC and ETSU could be travel partners as well in basketball). A basketball-only member would work nicely, too (as you pointed out).
why couldnt etsu be asus travel partner being we are so close and all
Mr. C
March 22nd, 2007, 01:21 AM
Because ETSU and UTC fit the natural rivalry thing much better. Those two schools hate each other. WCU and ASU have generally been matched up as travel partners most often in the past.
Fresno St. Alum
March 22nd, 2007, 02:46 AM
If they take ETSU they gotta take Winthrop. 10 FB 14 BB nice and even.
Mr. C
March 22nd, 2007, 07:20 AM
Winthrop isn't going anywhere.
PaladinFan
March 22nd, 2007, 07:30 AM
Wouldn't that kind of make for a weird league size? The football schedule would no longer be round-robin, the basketball divisions go back to being uneven, etc. Taking back ETSU would seem to me only desirable in a scheme to establish a division setup in football, a la CAA.
Here would be a small version, with Samford and the hypothetical ETSU.
e.g.:
North
App St
WCU
Elon
Furman
Wofford
South
UTC
Samford
ETSU
GSU
Citadel
Not bad. Teams would skip one team from the opposing division per year. Pain in the butt for the committee, of course, because league schedules would then require more scrutiny.
For a 'big' league possibility, take the above and add another program to each division, from Hampton, SC St, JSU, CCU, etc., obviously it's hard to say exactly who would be targeted and/or receptive. That could prompt another basketball only member (UNC-W often speculated). 12 football/16 basketball.
I prefer the round-robin aspect of a league with less than 10 members, personally. The big league format seems to work for the CAA, though.
What about....
East
The Citadel
Elon
Georgia Southern
Furman
Wofford
West
Samford
ETSU
App. State
Western Carolina
UTC
OL FU
March 22nd, 2007, 07:53 AM
From comments made by the Commish about a year ago, we seem destined for more than 9 football teams
mcveyrl
March 22nd, 2007, 08:17 AM
What makes you say that, FSA? Folks in Jonson City don't seem to have that attitude.
Everyone I've talked to (I work in Johnson City) wants to go back to the Southern Conference. But, I think that other sports at ETSU have suffered because of the move to the A-Sun and it would take some more time to get "caught up" with the rest of the SoCon.
appfan2008
March 22nd, 2007, 08:34 AM
Because ETSU and UTC fit the natural rivalry thing much better. Those two schools hate each other. WCU and ASU have generally been matched up as travel partners most often in the past.
just because they hate each other doesnt make it geographically the best fit... duh
appfan2008
March 22nd, 2007, 08:36 AM
I am just not a fan of the two division system and it is really too bad that is must be coming to this
Mr. C
March 22nd, 2007, 08:44 AM
I'm not either. I think teams should play all the other teams in the league to crown a true champion.
mcveyrl
March 22nd, 2007, 08:50 AM
I'm not either. I think teams should play all the other teams in the league to crown a true champion.
From someone who now has to deal with it (2 divisions)...it sucks.
Although, when we lose to Villanova while UMass goes undefeated, I can't complain too much...
OL FU
March 22nd, 2007, 09:00 AM
I agree I don't want to go beyond 9 teams. Way back when, the teams in the SoCon occasionally played a different number of Southern conference games ( I have no clue why). I think it happened in '83 when Furman and WCU were both undefeated, tied each other and Furman won the conference because we played one more game than Western (and it was a game that Western would have won - Davidson or VMI, I recall). Western beat us in the playoffs that year but we were the conference champs without sharing the title.
Appstate29
March 22nd, 2007, 09:00 AM
What about....
East
The Citadel
Elon
Georgia Southern
Furman
Wofford
West
Samford
ETSU
App. State
Western Carolina
UTC
that would not work IMO, App fans would go nuts if we only played GSU and FU on a rotating basis.
OL FU
March 22nd, 2007, 09:04 AM
that would not work IMO, App fans would go nuts if we only played GSU and FU on a rotating basis.
If we go to divisions it will happen. In my opinion there is no way Furman. ASU and GSU will be in the same division. IT will probably be split in a similar fashion to Basket Ball.
appfan2008
March 22nd, 2007, 09:08 AM
I'm not either. I think teams should play all the other teams in the league to crown a true champion.
hey Mr. C you agreed with me:D
MplsBison
March 22nd, 2007, 12:07 PM
Is there any talk of a new stadium or are they just going right back in the dome?
The Moody1
March 22nd, 2007, 12:46 PM
Is there any talk of a new stadium or are they just going right back in the dome?
If they re-start their program they will have a new stadium.
MplsBison
March 22nd, 2007, 12:55 PM
That's what I figured.
Where will the money come for that? Where will it be? Etc.
Any plans announced?
Golden Eagle
March 22nd, 2007, 02:10 PM
that would not work IMO, App fans would go nuts if we only played GSU and FU on a rotating basis.
If we go to divisions it will happen.
Not necessarily, it is easy to keep cross-division rivalries intact. In the SEC, Tennessee always plays Alabama despite being in different divisions, same for UGA and Auburn.
OL FU
March 22nd, 2007, 02:22 PM
Not necessarily, it is easy to keep cross-division rivalries intact. In the SEC, Tennessee always plays Alabama despite being in different divisions, same for UGA and Auburn.
You may be right but on the other hand, as the A-10 guys will tell you. The other division without Furman. ASU and GSU and Wofford ( they are only 25 miles away from Furman) will suck in Footballxrolleyesx :o
chattanoogamocs
March 22nd, 2007, 08:45 PM
that would not work IMO, App fans would go nuts if we only played GSU and FU on a rotating basis.
As Golden Eagle alluded to in the SEC...each school could designate a rival that you play every year in the other division no matter what (which is why Tennessee and Alabama always play each other).
As for split leagues, etc...get used to it. Unless someone starts making new conferences (or they quit letting any new teams into DI)...you are going to have more and more 12 to 14 team leagues. They gotta go somewhere.
And finally, about the stadium...the Mini Dome has been deemed unsafe for crowds over 5,500-6,000 (apparently post 9/11 fire codes). The article mentioned that the next step was to secure $15 mil for a new stadium (by 2008). That is the real hurdle...no new stadium = no football.
Best of luck to the Bucs, would love to see them back where they belong. Chattanooga (who has lost Marshall and ETSU) really has no one left to "hate". :)
AppMan
March 23rd, 2007, 08:24 AM
Is there any talk of a new stadium or are they just going right back in the dome?
Building a 10,000 seat stadium. Looks like SoCon football is in a major downsizing mode.
proasu89
March 23rd, 2007, 08:29 AM
Because ETSU and UTC fit the natural rivalry thing much better. Those two schools hate each other. WCU and ASU have generally been matched up as travel partners most often in the past.
What exactly is meant by travel partners? We don't car pool together. Is it like when App traveled to Charleston this season (basketball) and played CofC and Citadel on the same trip?
mcveyrl
March 23rd, 2007, 09:13 AM
That's what I figured.
Where will the money come for that? Where will it be? Etc.
Any plans announced?
They have not said where, but I hope it's on campus. The questionnaire sent around to faculty and staff asked the likelihood of going to a game if the stadium was 1) on campus; 2) in Johnson City; or 3) in the "Tri-Cities" area [there's a triangle of cities around JC that includes Kingsport and Bristol, for demographic purposes, it's usually considered one metro area].
It would be a big mistake to not put it on campus and an even bigger mistake not to put it in JC.
SoCon48
March 23rd, 2007, 09:49 AM
Because ETSU and UTC fit the natural rivalry thing much better. Those two schools hate each other. WCU and ASU have generally been matched up as travel partners most often in the past.
Yep, but ETSU sure brought some butts to KBS and VG. We really miss that.
appfan2008
March 23rd, 2007, 11:39 AM
Building a 10,000 seat stadium. Looks like SoCon football is in a major downsizing mode.
I agree I would like to see more stadiums like citadel gsu asu utc and fu not elon smford and etsu... those arent very big at all
Mr. C
March 23rd, 2007, 11:39 AM
What exactly is meant by travel partners? We don't car pool together. Is it like when App traveled to Charleston this season (basketball) and played CofC and Citadel on the same trip?
Exactly.
lizrdgizrd
March 23rd, 2007, 03:33 PM
What about....
East
The Citadel
Elon
Georgia Southern
Furman
Wofford
West
Samford
ETSU
App. State
Western Carolina
UTC
With 10 teams why would we need to have two divisions? I know that it'd only leave us with 2 OOC games but we'd still have a true conference champ every year.
OL FU
March 23rd, 2007, 03:59 PM
With 10 teams why would we need to have two divisions? I know that it'd only leave us with 2 OOC games but we'd still have a true conference champ every year.
Don't worry about it. If ETSU moves back to the SoCon, Furman will vote yes and go FBS indiexnodx xlolx
lizrdgizrd
March 23rd, 2007, 03:59 PM
Don't worry about it. If ETSU moves back to the SoCon, Furman will vote yes and go FBS indiexnodx xlolx
And they'll take ASU and GSU with them? xlolx
OL FU
March 23rd, 2007, 04:23 PM
And they'll take ASU and GSU with them? xlolx
We're taking Samford and Wofford:p you know, all of the 'fordsxeyebrowx
dbackjon
March 23rd, 2007, 04:35 PM
We're taking Samford and Wofford:p you know, all of the 'fordsxeyebrowx
And get Stanford as well?
lizrdgizrd
March 23rd, 2007, 05:41 PM
We're taking Samford and Wofford:p you know, all of the 'fordsxeyebrowx
And get Stanford as well?
Just think of the cash you could bring in with a corporate sponsor. Maybe...
Coke? xnutsx
appfan2008
March 23rd, 2007, 06:24 PM
With 10 teams why would we need to have two divisions? I know that it'd only leave us with 2 OOC games but we'd still have a true conference champ every year.
only 2ooc games would solve a lot of apps scheduling problems
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.