mmiller_34
September 6th, 2015, 10:54 AM
Alright, some of you might remember but I used to do an MVFC Power Rankings a few years back and it was a lot of fun but got way too complicated and I always ended up running into problems then having to mess around with the formula to see what went wrong. I am starting from scratch and looking into putting out some more power rankings this year. However, I need some help.
Instead of having a formula that jumbles up all the data and turning out some random number, I want to instead run the Power Rankings like fantasy football works. For example:
Points Allowed:
If allowed 0-9 points, then 30 power points earned
If allowed 10-19 points, then 20 power points earned
If allowed 20-29 points, then 10 power points earned
If allowed 30 + points, then 0 power points earned
Points Scored:
If scored 30+ points, then 30 power points earned
If scored 20-29 points, then 20 power points earned
If scored 10-19 points, then 10 power points earned
If scored 0-9, then 0 power points earned
Same deal with Offensive Yards & Defensive Yards allowed -- they'll run on similar scales but weighted half of what total points is since the most important thing is point differential. However, I think, you should earn some points for how much yards your team has gained and how many yards they have given up (for example, If racked up 500+ yards of offense you'll earn 15 PP)
There could also be other variables for power points earned based on the competition your team played, turnover margin, etc. For example:
Strength of Competition:
Ranked FBS: 5
FBS: 2.5
Ranked FCS: 2.0
FCS: 0
Lower Scholly Teams (D-III,DII, Pioneer, NEC): -5
The problem that I am running into is that Indiana State this week... would be #1 in the ranking since they BLEW Butler out of the water. I good performance sure, but certainly not enough I would think to put them in the top spot. So there has to be some sort of variable that penalizes Indiana State for playing weaker competition but still allows them to score some respectful Power Points since they did exactly what was expected of them.
Let me know what you think. I'll be busy on excel trying to figure this out.
Instead of having a formula that jumbles up all the data and turning out some random number, I want to instead run the Power Rankings like fantasy football works. For example:
Points Allowed:
If allowed 0-9 points, then 30 power points earned
If allowed 10-19 points, then 20 power points earned
If allowed 20-29 points, then 10 power points earned
If allowed 30 + points, then 0 power points earned
Points Scored:
If scored 30+ points, then 30 power points earned
If scored 20-29 points, then 20 power points earned
If scored 10-19 points, then 10 power points earned
If scored 0-9, then 0 power points earned
Same deal with Offensive Yards & Defensive Yards allowed -- they'll run on similar scales but weighted half of what total points is since the most important thing is point differential. However, I think, you should earn some points for how much yards your team has gained and how many yards they have given up (for example, If racked up 500+ yards of offense you'll earn 15 PP)
There could also be other variables for power points earned based on the competition your team played, turnover margin, etc. For example:
Strength of Competition:
Ranked FBS: 5
FBS: 2.5
Ranked FCS: 2.0
FCS: 0
Lower Scholly Teams (D-III,DII, Pioneer, NEC): -5
The problem that I am running into is that Indiana State this week... would be #1 in the ranking since they BLEW Butler out of the water. I good performance sure, but certainly not enough I would think to put them in the top spot. So there has to be some sort of variable that penalizes Indiana State for playing weaker competition but still allows them to score some respectful Power Points since they did exactly what was expected of them.
Let me know what you think. I'll be busy on excel trying to figure this out.